Seems like I did!
Yes, it is called citizen journalism. Setting up a site for the purpose is easy. But maintaining integrity of the articles will be a real problem. If nothing else, the minimum basic that has to be checked is whether the article is true or false. This will have to be done by humans and its thus going to be costly and not scalable. A better idea would be to follow the
Reddit.com style or better yet,
StackOverFlow.com style where people give up-point or down-point to an article thus giving the reader a good impression of what is good read and what is not worth his/her time.
However, a point to note for all Nepali sites is that the user base is small compared to English language website of general interest. The biggest Nepali sites today draw about 1500 to 3000 hits a day (
StackOverFlow.com started less than six months ago and it has
16 million hits a month and growing!). And since online ads is the only source of income, spending too much on technology or employing humans will not be viable.
An easier solution though would be something like a Nepali
Drudge Report where only one or two people select stories or a Nepali
TechCrunch.com with a bunch of dedicated people writing in. However, this idea defeats the purpose of citizen journalism altogether because the user submission is almost zero. And this leads me to think of
SlashDot.org (whose source code is freely available I believe) but then again, a story on slashdot has to be commented over and moderated by a huge number of people and user participation of that kind in the Nepali context is yet to be seen.